April 20, 2018, 01:28:47 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: Franchising  (Read 482 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« on: December 29, 2007, 09:33:26 PM »

Good article by Monte Dutton


Think it's surprising it's tilted in the favor of Nascar?

old hot rodder
Offline Offline

Posts: 2022

« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2007, 06:46:08 PM »

Sally, I suspect that Monte feels, as I do, that auto racing is fundamentally different from other "sports" to the extent that franchising would be silly.
 On the other hand, I disagree with him that there are "compelling" arguments on both sides of the issue. The argument, for instance, that franchising would significantly increase the "entry " barriers is rediculous. How many  new teams have started in the last few years? W/out Toyota's  big checkbook, would Mikey's team still be around? Not based on performance it wouldn't be.
  The current points arrangement is close enough to franchising, closer than it should be, and Roush and Evernham certainly found investor interest in their "teams". DEI effectively did also.

  Oh well, JMHO. I don't really understand the business of racing when so many dollars are involved anyhow. Sad

"Act as if what you do makes a difference. It does"
William James
Hall of Fame
Offline Offline

Posts: 5407

« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2008, 01:27:59 PM »

  The current points arrangement is close enough to franchising, closer than it should be,

I agree with Dick.  It's bad enough with the top 35 rule and owners points provisionals as it is.

Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!